Migration

Move your newsroom archive without losing the history, links, or search equity you built.

Masthead CMS migration planning starts with the content and operating realities that matter most: stories, media, authors, taxonomies, redirects, analytics, subscriber context, and the newsroom launch process.

Overview

Migration is not a content dump. It is a publishing continuity project.

A local news archive carries search visibility, community memory, author history, media metadata, and years of internal workflow assumptions. A serious migration plan has to account for the archive before design or launch decisions lock in the wrong structure.

The problem

The common failure is treating migration as an export/import task.

That approach often breaks old links, strips image credits, loses author relationships, flattens categories, ignores canonical fields, and leaves analytics teams rebuilding measurement after launch. Masthead CMS migration work is scoped around continuity first.

How it works

Here's how each part works.

Archive audit

Map what exists before deciding where it goes.

The audit should identify content types, URL patterns, authors, tags, categories, custom fields, media metadata, redirects, top search pages, newsletter forms, sponsored content, and analytics dependencies.

  • URL inventory
  • Content model mapping
  • Author and taxonomy review
  • Media metadata audit

Search protection

Redirects and canonicals are launch requirements.

Legacy story URLs, category pages, author pages, evergreen guides, and high-performing articles need a redirect strategy that preserves reader access and gives search engines a clean signal after launch.

  • 301 redirect map
  • Canonical fields
  • High-value URL review
  • Post-launch crawl checks

Operational launch

The newsroom needs confidence on day one.

Migration planning should include editorial training, form and newsletter checks, GAM and Prebid tag validation, analytics continuity and portlet validation, publishing permissions, slug-alias redirect review, and a launch QA checklist that goes beyond whether pages render.

  • Editor training
  • Analytics validation
  • Form checks
  • Launch QA

Archive hygiene

Clean taxonomy, media, and metadata before cutover.

Migration is also a chance to consolidate duplicate tags, reconcile author records, normalize media credits, and map fragile embeds so the new site launches with data editors can trust.

  • Duplicate taxonomy review
  • Author deduplication
  • Media credit audit
  • Embed and shortcode mapping

Workflow

A migration path built around risk reduction.

Every publisher has a different archive, but the implementation process should make the risk visible before launch.

01

Audit the current platform

Review archive exports, URL patterns, content fields, media, authors, taxonomy, GAM and Prebid setup, analytics tags, forms, and revenue placements.

02

Map content and redirects

Define how stories, pages, media, authors, tags, categories, SEO fields, and legacy URLs move into the new structure.

03

Validate before launch

Run content QA, redirect checks, GAM and Prebid validation, analytics and SEO portlet checks, editor workflow testing, and representative page review before cutover.

04

Monitor after launch

Watch crawl behavior, top landing pages, broken links, form submissions, and newsroom workflow issues during the launch window.

Content continuity

Stories, media, authors, tags, captions, and SEO fields should move with context, not just raw text.

Search continuity

Redirects, canonicals, metadata, and sitemap output should be validated before and after launch.

Operational continuity

Editors, audience teams, and revenue stakeholders need a system they can use immediately.

Shared launch picture

Editorial, audience, revenue, and technology teams align on one checklist and risk profile before go-live instead of discovering gaps after URLs flip.

Decision points

Questions to settle before you commit.

What if our archive is messy?

Most local news archives are. The migration audit is designed to expose messy fields, duplicate taxonomies, missing metadata, and URL exceptions before they become launch-day surprises.

Can we move in phases?

A phased approach can be scoped when an archive, multi-site group, or legacy platform makes a single cutover too risky.

FAQ

Common questions about migration.

Can Masthead CMS migrate a WordPress news archive?

Yes. WordPress migrations can include posts, pages, authors, categories, tags, media, captions, SEO fields, redirects, and related publishing metadata.

Can Masthead CMS migrate from BLOX CMS, TownNews, or Arc XP?

Migration can be scoped from BLOX CMS, TownNews, Arc XP, and other publisher platforms when exports, APIs, feeds, database access, or archive files are available.

Can redirects be preserved?

Yes. Redirect planning is part of the migration process so legacy URLs can point readers and search engines to the right new locations.

What happens to image captions and credits?

Media migration should preserve captions, credits, alt text, dimensions, focal points, and attachment relationships where the source data makes that possible.

Will ad tags and header bidding continue through migration?

GAM slot definitions, Prebid configuration, CMP wiring, and direct-sold sponsorship modules should be reviewed before launch so programmatic and direct revenue does not break at cutover.

Can analytics continue through migration?

Analytics continuity, external provider connections, and in-CMS portlet setup should be reviewed before launch so measurement is part of the implementation plan.

Do newsroom teams get training?

Training and launch support can be scoped so editors understand the new workflow before the public launch.

Contact sales

Start with the archive before you commit to a launch path.

Share your current CMS, archive size, URL concerns, media library, analytics requirements, and launch timeline so the migration can be scoped responsibly.

Start a migration audit